PRAETIR / Comparisons

Heatmap or footprint: the differences

Heatmaps and footprints show different parts of the same market: offered liquidity and executed volume. The useful view depends on the question being reviewed.

Distinguish offered liquidity from executions

An order-flow heatmap tracks displayed order-book size across price and time. A footprint assigns executed volume to price levels within a bar, for example by bid and ask. A large footprint number therefore does not mean the same thing as a bright heatmap area.

Read one level in both views

A synthetic price area first displays 500 contracts. Later, 200 contracts execute there. A heatmap can show changes in offered size through time; a footprint records the executions within its bar. The fact that 200 traded does not by itself explain what happened to every initially displayed order.

Compare matching data windows

Use the same contract, feed and time window. A short footprint excerpt and a long heatmap history otherwise cover different events. Check price aggregation and bar type before interpreting differences as contradictions.

Ask two separate review questions

First ask: What liquidity was visible before the decision? Then ask: What executed during contact? Record both answers with timestamps. Switching tools is useful when it provides an additional observation.

The question determines the view
Review questionHeatmapFootprint
Previously displayed sizeCan be examined over timeCannot be inferred from fills alone
Executions at each priceNeeds an execution overlayCore of the display

Sources and methodology

Sources explain concepts or the respective provider’s product descriptions. Worked examples are original and synthetic. Verify current contract specifications before use.

PRAETIR SYSTEMS

From understanding to your own review.

Explore the analytics platform or request access to the current early-access program.

Request early access ↗